Do all paths lead to the same source? Or do all paths come to the same source, with only some finding their way back?
I'll just have to find out.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
The Muslim Scientist
Sometimes I think being a Muslim in Sciences (The faculty) is wonderful. Every subject that we study provides more food for wonder at the cosmos.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
That's what I feel. But other times I feel that this is too simplistic of an approach. We don't always consider the possible meaning or consequences of what a simple "scientific" theory are in terms of how it influences the way we think and deal with the world.
And for all the science dogmatists in the world, by definition scientific fact has no permanence. It only takes one conclusive test to prove that an idea is wrong, while in contrast, no scientific theory can ever be proven. This is both the strength and weakness of science.
The trouble is, how can you believe in something that has no permanence? In reality, people (like the person who once took us on a hike in Jasper) who "believe" in science simply believe in their own dogmatic assumptions.
Pray for the Cnidarian-only two germ layers, sessile, and can only hope that some bit of goodness will float along.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
That's what I feel. But other times I feel that this is too simplistic of an approach. We don't always consider the possible meaning or consequences of what a simple "scientific" theory are in terms of how it influences the way we think and deal with the world.
And for all the science dogmatists in the world, by definition scientific fact has no permanence. It only takes one conclusive test to prove that an idea is wrong, while in contrast, no scientific theory can ever be proven. This is both the strength and weakness of science.
The trouble is, how can you believe in something that has no permanence? In reality, people (like the person who once took us on a hike in Jasper) who "believe" in science simply believe in their own dogmatic assumptions.
Pray for the Cnidarian-only two germ layers, sessile, and can only hope that some bit of goodness will float along.
Monday, November 24, 2008
Beginnings
What burns me is from me.
The past/current fashion on blogs is to write elliptically, mysteriously and cleverly. This forces the reader to attempt to read between the lines Eg. Why is the name of the blog "Broccoli Sprouts"? What is the metaphorical meaning of this highly superlative name.
Yeah, well that's not my talent. I guess all I can do is relate what has happened to me, and what I can see from it. I hate self-deprecation as well, as all it indicates is a more subtle form of arrogance. So I won't do it. As Sherlock Holmes would say, "I cannot agree with those who rank modesty among the virtues. To the logician all things should be seen exactly as they are, and to underestimate one's self is as much a departure from truth as to exaggerate one's own powers."
One thing I shouldn't be underestimate is my revision for final exams. Somehow this semester I haven't really gotten into full swing-(or maybe I always feel like that, and I never really have gotten into full swing?) but partly this is due to the fact that my time is frittered away on inanities.
Someday, I will transform lead into gold.

The past/current fashion on blogs is to write elliptically, mysteriously and cleverly. This forces the reader to attempt to read between the lines Eg. Why is the name of the blog "Broccoli Sprouts"? What is the metaphorical meaning of this highly superlative name.
Yeah, well that's not my talent. I guess all I can do is relate what has happened to me, and what I can see from it. I hate self-deprecation as well, as all it indicates is a more subtle form of arrogance. So I won't do it. As Sherlock Holmes would say, "I cannot agree with those who rank modesty among the virtues. To the logician all things should be seen exactly as they are, and to underestimate one's self is as much a departure from truth as to exaggerate one's own powers."
One thing I shouldn't be underestimate is my revision for final exams. Somehow this semester I haven't really gotten into full swing-(or maybe I always feel like that, and I never really have gotten into full swing?) but partly this is due to the fact that my time is frittered away on inanities.
Someday, I will transform lead into gold.

Sunday, September 14, 2008
Ramadan Karim...belated
"Has not the time yet come for those who believe that their hearts should be humble for the remembrance of Allah and what has come down of the truth?"
-Surah Hadeed (Ayah 16)
-Surah Hadeed (Ayah 16)
Thursday, June 5, 2008
Programme
Nobody will read this who doesn't already know, but in case you are new, then please be aware that I will be having my performance on Saturday, June 7, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. at the Speech Studio. Please contact me for more details.
Make voyages. Attempt them. There's nothing else.
-Tennessee Williams
Make voyages. Attempt them. There's nothing else.
-Tennessee Williams
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Seeking Wild
Another classic play, except the playwright himself is messed up.
This is one of the central problems for a Muslim trying to do oral interpretation: is it possible to separate a text from its author? If so, then how is that done? From our perspective, there is no deed without intention, a vessel does not pour out except that which is inside it. So how could a morally bereft person ever produce a literary text that actually has some merit?
I think that it should be clarified that when we perform something on the stage, we are not condoning it or becoming it. Often times the playwright is actually trying to achieve the opposite. For example, in a play like Volpone, Jonson is satirizing society and its deceitfulness.
This is not to say that it is okay for obscene things to occur on stage. Openly flaunting obscenity doesn't serve any purpose except to spread immoral things throughout society. But trying to show our inner flaws, to show us different angles of humanity, that's the purpose of performing.
Acting today has been so tarnished by Hollywood and co. that it is almost impossible to think of performance has anything but that. That's why we maybe need to produce a Muslim perspective of, oh, Macbeth or something. I think that would be cool.
Note: I am not talking about the Mosquers. It's a good idea, but I want to see some solid acting. For real.
"Of course, if they hit you with the bicycle the glass will not be half full or half empty, it will be shattered to pieces and you'll be dead or in the hospital."
This is one of the central problems for a Muslim trying to do oral interpretation: is it possible to separate a text from its author? If so, then how is that done? From our perspective, there is no deed without intention, a vessel does not pour out except that which is inside it. So how could a morally bereft person ever produce a literary text that actually has some merit?
I think that it should be clarified that when we perform something on the stage, we are not condoning it or becoming it. Often times the playwright is actually trying to achieve the opposite. For example, in a play like Volpone, Jonson is satirizing society and its deceitfulness.
This is not to say that it is okay for obscene things to occur on stage. Openly flaunting obscenity doesn't serve any purpose except to spread immoral things throughout society. But trying to show our inner flaws, to show us different angles of humanity, that's the purpose of performing.
Acting today has been so tarnished by Hollywood and co. that it is almost impossible to think of performance has anything but that. That's why we maybe need to produce a Muslim perspective of, oh, Macbeth or something. I think that would be cool.
Note: I am not talking about the Mosquers. It's a good idea, but I want to see some solid acting. For real.
"Of course, if they hit you with the bicycle the glass will not be half full or half empty, it will be shattered to pieces and you'll be dead or in the hospital."
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Ode to a Seagull
If you haven't read this poem by Pablo Neruda, do it. This is why you should read poetry: it allows you to look at life in a starkly different and crystalline form.
I often come back to this: we ought to be thankful. And I'm not talking about Christopher Durang-style thankfulness, "You do not have cancer-at least not today." I mean the very fact that we can eat food and not have to poke ourselves with a needle is a simple blessing that millions don't have.
The ability to appreciate is the most precious of all.
I often come back to this: we ought to be thankful. And I'm not talking about Christopher Durang-style thankfulness, "You do not have cancer-at least not today." I mean the very fact that we can eat food and not have to poke ourselves with a needle is a simple blessing that millions don't have.
The ability to appreciate is the most precious of all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)